GitHub user carloea2 added a comment to the discussion: Manual testing expectations for PRs
1. What should the manual testing expectations be for different types of PRs? I prefer all of the PRs should be manually tested, 1 setting at least should be good enough. 2. What should PR authors be expected to include? I think current template is good but the points you mentioned will be helpful. 3. What should reviewers be expected to check? I prefer reviewer test the PR manually in 1 setting at least. 4. How can we make testing across different environments more practical? I have not proposal for this point. Thanks GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/texera/discussions/6028#discussioncomment-17493042 ---- This is an automatically sent email for [email protected]. To unsubscribe, please send an email to: [email protected]
