GitHub user sshiv012 added a comment to the discussion: Proposal: Statement-level Python-to-Texera workflow compiler MVP
Thanks for the detailed proposal and prototype. It is definitely great. My only question is how this fits with the existing LLM-based migration tool: what specific need does the compiler meet that the LLM path does not, and is that need strong enough to justify two supported approaches? Because of this concern, in terms of delivery, I’d prefer that we review the pieces incrementally but merge the feature once the agreed end-to-end MVP is ready. If implementation needs several PRs, a stack or coordinated series of commits could keep them reviewable while making the complete behavior and integration the merge target. Could we agree on the MVP’s required examples and acceptance criteria first, including how we’ll validate the compiler’s equivalence claim? GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/texera/discussions/8160#discussioncomment-18575043 ---- This is an automatically sent email for [email protected]. To unsubscribe, please send an email to: [email protected]
