dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [D] Proposal: Unify Macro & Template [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Unify Macro & Template [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Unify Macro & Template [texera] via GitHub
• [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Texera (incubating) 1.2.0-incubating RC4 Xuan Gu
• Podling Texera Report Reminder - August 2026 jmclean
  • Re: Podling Texera Report Reminder - August 2026 Chen Li
• [VOTE] Release Apache Texera (incubating) 1.2.0-incubating (RC4) Xuan Gu
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Texera (incubating) 1.2.0-incubating (RC4) Ryan Zhang
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Texera (incubating) 1.2.0-incubating (RC4) Carlos Ernesto Alvarez Berumen
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Texera (incubating) 1.2.0-incubating (RC4) Xinyuan Lin
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Texera (incubating) 1.2.0-incubating (RC4) Matthew Ball
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Texera (incubating) 1.2.0-incubating (RC4) Chen Li
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Texera (incubating) 1.2.0-incubating (RC4) Eugene Gu
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Texera (incubating) 1.2.0-incubating (RC4) Ali Risheh
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Texera (incubating) 1.2.0-incubating (RC4) Xiaozhen Liu
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Texera (incubating) 1.2.0-incubating (RC4) Xinyuan Lin
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Texera (incubating) 1.2.0-incubating (RC4) Zuozhi Wang
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Texera (incubating) 1.2.0-incubating (RC4) Shengquan Ni
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Texera (incubating) 1.2.0-incubating (RC4) Xuan Gu
• [D] Proposal - Change share workflow screen [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Change share workflow screen [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Change share workflow screen [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Change share workflow screen [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Change share workflow screen [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Change share workflow screen [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Change share workflow screen [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Change share workflow screen [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Change share workflow screen [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Change share workflow screen [texera] via GitHub
• [FYI] Texera v1.2.0-incubating RC4 planned for July 30 Xuan Gu
  • Re: [FYI] Texera v1.2.0-incubating RC4 planned for July 30 Yicong Huang
  • Re: [FYI] Texera v1.2.0-incubating RC4 planned for July 30 Ian Maxon
  • Re: [FYI] Texera v1.2.0-incubating RC4 planned for July 30 Xuan Gu
• [D] Proposal - Pin the published version of a workflow [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Pin the published version of a workflow [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Pin the published version of a workflow [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Pin the published version of a workflow [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Pin the published version of a workflow [texera] via GitHub
• [D] CI for workflow-to-Python verification: pooled Python workers [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] CI for workflow-to-Python verification: pooled Python workers [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] CI for workflow-to-Python verification: pooled Python workers [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] CI for workflow-to-Python verification: pooled Python workers [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] CI for workflow-to-Python verification: pooled Python workers [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] CI for workflow-to-Python verification: pooled Python workers [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] CI for workflow-to-Python verification: pooled Python workers [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] CI for workflow-to-Python verification: pooled Python workers [texera] via GitHub
• [D] Adopt a UCI-sponsored self-hosted GitHub Actions runner [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Adopt a UCI-sponsored self-hosted GitHub Actions runner [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Adopt a UCI-sponsored self-hosted GitHub Actions runner [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Adopt a UCI-sponsored self-hosted GitHub Actions runner [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Adopt a UCI-sponsored self-hosted GitHub Actions runner [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Adopt a UCI-sponsored self-hosted GitHub Actions runner [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Adopt a UCI-sponsored self-hosted GitHub Actions runner [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Adopt a UCI-sponsored self-hosted GitHub Actions runner [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Adopt a UCI-sponsored self-hosted GitHub Actions runner [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Adopt a UCI-sponsored self-hosted GitHub Actions runner [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Adopt a UCI-sponsored self-hosted GitHub Actions runner [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Adopt a UCI-sponsored self-hosted GitHub Actions runner [texera] via GitHub
• [D] Loop Start requires exactly one materialized reader on its input port, is lifting this planned? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Loop Start requires exactly one materialized reader on its input port, is lifting this planned? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Loop Start requires exactly one materialized reader on its input port, is lifting this planned? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Loop Start requires exactly one materialized reader on its input port, is lifting this planned? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Loop Start requires exactly one materialized reader on its input port, is lifting this planned? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Loop Start requires exactly one materialized reader on its input port, is lifting this planned? [texera] via GitHub
• [D] What should "Import Workflow" do? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] What should "Import Workflow" do? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] What should "Import Workflow" do? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] What should "Import Workflow" do? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] What should "Import Workflow" do? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] What should "Import Workflow" do? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] What should "Import Workflow" do? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] What should "Import Workflow" do? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] What should "Import Workflow" do? [texera] via GitHub
• [D] Proposal: Automated operator-demo video generator [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automated operator-demo video generator [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automated operator-demo video generator [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automated operator-demo video generator [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automated operator-demo video generator [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automated operator-demo video generator [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automated operator-demo video generator [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automated operator-demo video generator [texera] via GitHub
• [D] Usability (Authentication): Ideal methods to sign in? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Usability (Authentication): Ideal methods to sign in? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Usability (Authentication): Ideal methods to sign in? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Usability (Authentication): Ideal methods to sign in? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Usability (Authentication): Ideal methods to sign in? [texera] via GitHub
• [D] UX confusion: Search bar [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX confusion: Search bar [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX confusion: Search bar [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX confusion: Search bar [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX confusion: Search bar [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX confusion: Search bar [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX confusion: Search bar [texera] via GitHub
• [D] Design input: should a Python UDF mount multiple datasets, or just one? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Design input: should a Python UDF mount multiple datasets, or just one? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Design input: should a Python UDF mount multiple datasets, or just one? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Design input: should a Python UDF mount multiple datasets, or just one? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Design input: should a Python UDF mount multiple datasets, or just one? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Design input: should a Python UDF mount multiple datasets, or just one? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Design input: should a Python UDF mount multiple datasets, or just one? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Design input: should a Python UDF mount multiple datasets, or just one? [texera] via GitHub
• [D] UX Feedback (Operator Descriptions) [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback (Operator Descriptions) [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback (Operator Descriptions) [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback (Operator Descriptions) [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback (Operator Descriptions) [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback (Operator Descriptions) [texera] via GitHub
• Accepted: Monthly Texera Incubation Sync Meeting on July 28, Tuesday, 3:00 - 4:00 PM PDT yiconghuang
  • Accepted: Monthly Texera Incubation Sync Meeting on July 28, Tuesday, 3:00 - 4:00 PM PDT yiconghuang
• [D] Unifying Project-Specific Code in a Single Repository [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Unifying Project-Specific Code in a Single Repository [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Unifying Project-Specific Code in a Single Repository [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Unifying Project-Specific Code in a Single Repository [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Support external and domain-specific code integrations [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Support external and domain-specific code integrations [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Support external and domain-specific code integrations [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Support external and domain-specific code integrations [texera] via GitHub
• [D] Unify Project Landing/About Pages via Block Composition [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Unify Project Landing/About Pages via Block Composition [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Unify Project Landing/About Pages via Block Composition [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Support customizable landing/about pages via block composition [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Support Customizable Landing/About Pages via Block Composition [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Support customizable landing/about pages via block composition [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Support customizable landing/about pages via block composition [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Support customizable landing/about pages via block composition [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Support customizable landing/about pages via block composition [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Support customizable landing/about pages via block composition [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Support customizable landing/about pages via block composition [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Support customizable landing/about pages via block composition [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Support customizable landing/about pages via block composition [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Support customizable landing/about pages via block composition [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Support customizable landing/about pages via block composition [texera] via GitHub
• [D] UX Feedback: Trash Icon Behavior When Removing Packages from an Environment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback: Trash Icon Behavior When Removing Packages from an Environment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback: Trash Icon Behavior When Removing Packages from an Environment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback: Trash Icon Behavior When Removing Packages from an Environment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback: Trash Icon Behavior When Removing Packages from an Environment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback: Trash Icon Behavior When Removing Packages from an Environment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback: Trash Icon Behavior When Removing Packages from an Environment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback: Trash Icon Behavior When Removing Packages from an Environment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback: Trash Icon Behavior When Removing Packages from an Environment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback: Trash Icon Behavior When Removing Packages from an Environment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback: Trash Icon Behavior When Removing Packages from an Environment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback: Trash Icon Behavior When Removing Packages from an Environment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback: Trash Icon Behavior When Removing Packages from an Environment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback: Trash Icon Behavior When Removing Packages from an Environment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback: Trash Icon Behavior When Removing Packages from an Environment [texera] via GitHub
• [D] Proposal - Migrate Login Page out of about. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrate Login Page out of about. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrate Login Page out of about. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrate Login Page out of about. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrate Login Page out of about. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrate Login Page out of about. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrate Login Page out of about. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrate Login Page out of about. [texera] via GitHub
• [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages