Agreed. Will cancel the vote on RC1. 

thanks
— Hitesh 


> On May 2, 2016, at 7:57 AM, Jason Lowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I think 0.7.1 should include TEZ-3193 which was marked as a Blocker for 
> 0.7.1.  We've seen a number of jobs on our clusters deadlock because of it.
> Jason
> 
> 
>      From: Hitesh Shah <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected] 
> Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2016 11:25 PM
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.7.1 RC1
> 
> Hi folks,
> 
> Sorry for the long wait. I have finally created an RC for 0.7.1 with the 
> binary release bits included. The binary release is compiled against 
> hadoop-2.6.0. Please do validate the binary bits as well as the 
> license/notice files. The steps used to create the tarball are here: 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TEZ/Making+a+TEZ+Release#MakingaTEZRelease-CreateBinaryTarballasahelperforUsers.
>  Please provide feedback or edit 
> "https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TEZ/Tez+Release+FAQ” if the 
> instructions for using the binary tarball need any tweaks. 
> 
> Tez 0.7.1 contains over a hundred bug fixes on top of 0.7.0. 
> 
> GIT source tag
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tez/repo?p=tez.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/release-0.7.1-rc1
>  ( commit hash 258d681311255e8cb88c2885e11a8314854fbb20 )
> 
> Staging site: 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tez/apache-tez-0.7.1-rc1/ ( svn rev 
> 13494 )
> 
> Nexus Staging URL:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetez-1050
> 
> PGP release keys 
> http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA9510905F0B000F0
> 
> KEYS file available at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tez/KEYS
> 
> One can look into the issues fixed in this release at
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+%3D+TEZ+AND+fixVersion+%3D+0.7.1+AND+status+%3D+Resolved+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC
> 
> Vote will be open for 72 hours ( until Fri 26th June ).
> 
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> 
> I begin with my vote with my +1.
> 
> thanks
> — Hitesh
> 

Reply via email to