Github user m50d commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/253#issuecomment-62168094
It could, but ultimately they should become independent (or rather, there
should be a superinterface that represents "either of these" and I guess a
visitor rather than the instanceof check in AbstractNonblockingServer).
TBaseAsyncProcessor and similar should not really implement the synchronous
form of process() and should not really implement TProcessor at all (neither
directly nor by dint of TAsyncProcessor extending it), but as I said in the
initial pull request, that would be a more intrusive change; that said I'm
happy to do that if you like.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
