[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12965279#action_12965279
]
Benjamin Douglas commented on TIKA-461:
---------------------------------------
Did you try patch -p1? The test patch was meant to be incremental on top of
your original patch. I didn't use svn diff because it creates a diff from the
trunk, not just the changes on top of the patch you attached here. If you want,
I can either do an svn diff (which would include both your changes and mine) or
I can simply zip up the test code and content as plain files.
> RFC822 messages not parsed
> --------------------------
>
> Key: TIKA-461
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-461
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: parser
> Affects Versions: 0.7
> Reporter: Joshua Turner
> Assignee: Julien Nioche
> Attachments: testRFC822-multipart, TIKA-461-tests-1.patch,
> TIKA-461.patch
>
>
> Presented with an RFC822 message exported from Thunderbird, AutodetectParser
> produces an empty body, and a Metadata containing only one key-value pair:
> "Content-Type=message/rfc822". Directly calling MboxParser likewise gives an
> empty body, but with two metadata pairs: "Content-Encoding=us-ascii
> Content-Type=application/mbox".
> A quick peek at the source of MboxParser shows that the implementation is
> pretty naive. If the wiring can be sorted out, something like Apache James'
> mime4j might be a better bet.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
