[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13004203#comment-13004203
 ] 

Sjoerd Smeets commented on TIKA-461:
------------------------------------

No problems, I'll open up a new Jira Ticket. However, not all patches are 
applied in tika-0.9. For example TIKA-461-config.patch, is not implemented yet.



> RFC822 messages not parsed
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: TIKA-461
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-461
>             Project: Tika
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: parser
>    Affects Versions: 0.7
>            Reporter: Joshua Turner
>            Assignee: Julien Nioche
>         Attachments: TIKA-461-config.patch, TIKA-461-parse.patch, 
> TIKA-461-plus-tests-1.patch, TIKA-461.patch, extra_metadata.patch, 
> testRFC822-CC-BCC, testRFC822-big, testRFC822-multipart
>
>
> Presented with an RFC822 message exported from Thunderbird, AutodetectParser 
> produces an empty body, and a Metadata containing only one key-value pair: 
> "Content-Type=message/rfc822". Directly calling MboxParser likewise gives an 
> empty body, but with two metadata pairs: "Content-Encoding=us-ascii 
> Content-Type=application/mbox".
> A quick peek at the source of MboxParser shows that the implementation is 
> pretty naive. If the wiring can be sorted out, something like Apache James' 
> mime4j might be a better bet.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to