OK RC #2 coming up shortly, just brought the branch up to date in r1621623. Also cleaned up JIRA.
Here goes.. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -----Original Message----- From: <Mattmann>, Chris Mattmann <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, July 31, 2014 11:29 AM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Tika 1.6 release candidate #1 >Guys, based on all the comments here, I am going to roll another >RC #2 to address: > >- Tyler's comment about getting the MicrosoftTranslator fix incorporated. >- Dave's Lingo24 API plugin for translate >- Nick's POI updates > >I'll roll another RC #2 probably on Monday. > >Thanks! > >Cheers, >Chris > >P.S. When I do, I'll diff trunk against the branch and then roll any >trunk updates post branch to 1.6 into the new 1.6 RC #2. > >++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. >Chief Architect >Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) >NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA >Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 >Email: [email protected] >WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ >++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department >University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA >++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: <Mattmann>, Chris Mattmann <[email protected]> >Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >Date: Monday, July 28, 2014 11:45 AM >To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Tika 1.6 release candidate #1 > >>Thanks Sergey - I pushed to 1.7 since we have been having a DISCUSS >>thread for a few weeks about getting 1.6 out. Do you have a patch right >>now for TIKA-1367? If so I'm happy to incorporate it and roll an RC #2 >>to get it in. If you don't have a patch yet, would you mind terribly if >>we pushed out 1.6, which already today has a ton of great updates, then >>shortly thereafter rolled a 1.7 (or did so when you finished with >>TIKA-1367)? >> >>Cheers, >>Chris >> >> >>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. >>Chief Architect >>Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) >>NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA >>Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 >>Email: [email protected] >>WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ >>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department >>University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA >>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> >> >> >> >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Sergey Beryozkin <[email protected]> >>Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>Date: Monday, July 28, 2014 11:38 AM >>To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Tika 1.6 release candidate #1 >> >>>+0 given that it appears that the tika-parsers dependencies >>>documentation issue has been pushed away. I'm getting confused why. >>> >>>Thanks. Sergey >>> >>>[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1367 >>> >>>On 28/07/14 17:16, Tyler Palsulich wrote: >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> OSX 10.9.3, Java 1.7 >>>> >>>> Tyler >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:09 AM, Allison, Timothy B. >>>><[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> Linux version 2.6.32-431.5.1.el6.x86_64: Java 1.6 and 1.7 >>>>> Windows 7, Java 1.7 >>>>> >>>>> I also ran Tika 1.5 and 1.6 rc1 against a random selection of 10,000 >>>>>docs >>>>> (all formats) plus all available msoffice-x files in govdocs1, >>>>>yielding >>>>> 10,413 docs. There were several improvements in text extraction for >>>>>PDFs >>>>> (mostly spacing) and 4 fewer exceptions (2 ppt, 1 doc and 1 pdf). >>>>> >>>>> There was one regression: >>>>> http://digitalcorpora.org/corp/nps/files/govdocs1/268/268620.pptx >>>>> >>>>> Stacktrace: >>>>> Caused by: java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index >>>>>out >>>>>of >>>>> range: -369073454 >>>>> at java.lang.String.checkBounds(String.java:371) >>>>> at java.lang.String.<init>(String.java:415) >>>>> at >>>>> >>>>>org.apache.poi.util.StringUtil.getFromCompressedUnicode(StringUtil.jav >>>>>a >>>>>: >>>>>114) >>>>> at >>>>> >>>>>org.apache.poi.poifs.filesystem.Ole10Native.<init>(Ole10Native.java:16 >>>>>3 >>>>>) >>>>> at >>>>> >>>>>org.apache.poi.poifs.filesystem.Ole10Native.createFromEmbeddedOleObjec >>>>>t >>>>>( >>>>>Ole10Native.java:91) >>>>> at >>>>> >>>>>org.apache.poi.poifs.filesystem.Ole10Native.createFromEmbeddedOleObjec >>>>>t >>>>>( >>>>>Ole10Native.java:63) >>>>> at >>>>> >>>>>org.apache.tika.parser.microsoft.ooxml.AbstractOOXMLExtractor.handleEm >>>>>b >>>>>e >>>>>ddedOLE(AbstractOOXMLExtractor.java:250) >>>>> at >>>>> >>>>>org.apache.tika.parser.microsoft.ooxml.AbstractOOXMLExtractor.handleEm >>>>>b >>>>>e >>>>>ddedParts(AbstractOOXMLExtractor.java:199) >>>>> at >>>>> >>>>>org.apache.tika.parser.microsoft.ooxml.AbstractOOXMLExtractor.getXHTML >>>>>( >>>>>A >>>>>bstractOOXMLExtractor.java:115) >>>>> at >>>>> >>>>>org.apache.tika.parser.microsoft.ooxml.OOXMLExtractorFactory.parse(OOX >>>>>M >>>>>L >>>>>ExtractorFactory.java:112) >>>>> at >>>>> >>>>>org.apache.tika.parser.microsoft.ooxml.OOXMLParser.parse(OOXMLParser.j >>>>>a >>>>>v >>>>>a:82) >>>>> at >>>>> >>>>>org.apache.tika.parser.CompositeParser.parse(CompositeParser.java:243) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Mattmann, Chris A (3980) [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 12:22 AM >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Cc: [email protected] >>>>> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Tika 1.6 release candidate #1 >>>>> >>>>> Hi Folks, >>>>> >>>>> A candidate for the Tika 1.6 release is available at: >>>>> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mattmann/apache-tika-1.6/rc1/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: >>>>> >>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tika/tags/1.6/ >>>>> >>>>> The SHA1 checksum of the archive is >>>>> 076ad343be56a540a4c8e395746fa4fda5b5b6d3. >>>>> >>>>> A Maven staging repository is available at: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetika-1003/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tika 1.6. >>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at >>>>> least three +1 Tika PMC votes are cast. >>>>> >>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tika 1.6 >>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package becauseŠ >>>>> >>>>> Thank you! >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Chris >>>>> >>>>> P.S. Here is my +1! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> >
