Commit it to trunk and then yes 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Aug 31, 2014, at 1:11 PM, "Tyler Palsulich" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Can we get TIKA-1404 in 1.6? Simple, but significant, fix.
> 
> Tyler
> On Aug 31, 2014 3:54 PM, "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Ugh, sorry. Maven release plugin issues, going to have to clean some
>> stuff up here. Don't mind me folks.
>> 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>> Chief Architect
>> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
>> Email: [email protected]
>> WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: <Mattmann>, Chris Mattmann <[email protected]>
>> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>> Date: Sunday, August 31, 2014 12:37 PM
>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Tika 1.6 release candidate #1
>> 
>>> OK RC #2 coming up shortly, just brought the branch up to date in
>>> r1621623. Also cleaned up JIRA.
>>> 
>>> Here goes..
>>> 
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>>> Chief Architect
>>> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>>> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
>>> Email: [email protected]
>>> WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: <Mattmann>, Chris Mattmann <[email protected]>
>>> Date: Thursday, July 31, 2014 11:29 AM
>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Tika 1.6 release candidate #1
>>> 
>>>> Guys, based on all the comments here, I am going to roll another
>>>> RC #2 to address:
>>>> 
>>>> - Tyler's comment about getting the MicrosoftTranslator fix incorporated.
>>>> - Dave's Lingo24 API plugin for translate
>>>> - Nick's POI updates
>>>> 
>>>> I'll roll another RC #2 probably on Monday.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Chris
>>>> 
>>>> P.S. When I do, I'll diff trunk against the branch and then roll any
>>>> trunk updates post branch to 1.6 into the new 1.6 RC #2.
>>>> 
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>>>> Chief Architect
>>>> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
>>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>>>> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
>>>> Email: [email protected]
>>>> WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
>>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: <Mattmann>, Chris Mattmann <[email protected]>
>>>> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>> Date: Monday, July 28, 2014 11:45 AM
>>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Tika 1.6 release candidate #1
>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks Sergey - I pushed to 1.7 since we have been having a DISCUSS
>>>>> thread for a few weeks about getting 1.6 out. Do you have a patch right
>>>>> now for TIKA-1367? If so I'm happy to incorporate it and roll an RC #2
>>>>> to get it in. If you don't have a patch yet, would you mind terribly if
>>>>> we pushed out 1.6, which already today has a ton of great updates, then
>>>>> shortly thereafter rolled a 1.7 (or did so when you finished with
>>>>> TIKA-1367)?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Chris
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>>>>> Chief Architect
>>>>> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
>>>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>>>>> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
>>>>> Email: [email protected]
>>>>> WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
>>>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Sergey Beryozkin <[email protected]>
>>>>> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>>> Date: Monday, July 28, 2014 11:38 AM
>>>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Tika 1.6 release candidate #1
>>>>> 
>>>>>> +0 given that it appears that the tika-parsers dependencies
>>>>>> documentation issue has been pushed away. I'm getting confused why.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks. Sergey
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1367
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 28/07/14 17:16, Tyler Palsulich wrote:
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> OSX 10.9.3, Java 1.7
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Tyler
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:09 AM, Allison, Timothy B.
>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Linux version 2.6.32-431.5.1.el6.x86_64: Java 1.6 and 1.7
>>>>>>>> Windows 7, Java 1.7
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I also ran Tika 1.5 and 1.6 rc1 against a random selection of 10,000
>>>>>>>> docs
>>>>>>>> (all formats) plus all available msoffice-x files in govdocs1,
>>>>>>>> yielding
>>>>>>>> 10,413 docs.  There were several improvements in text extraction for
>>>>>>>> PDFs
>>>>>>>> (mostly spacing) and 4 fewer exceptions (2 ppt, 1 doc and 1 pdf).
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> There was one regression:
>>>>>>>> http://digitalcorpora.org/corp/nps/files/govdocs1/268/268620.pptx
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Stacktrace:
>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index
>>>>>>>> out
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> range: -369073454
>>>>>>>>         at java.lang.String.checkBounds(String.java:371)
>>>>>>>>         at java.lang.String.<init>(String.java:415)
>>>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> org.apache.poi.util.StringUtil.getFromCompressedUnicode(StringUtil.ja
>>>>>>>> v
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>> 114)
>>>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> org.apache.poi.poifs.filesystem.Ole10Native.<init>(Ole10Native.java:1
>>>>>>>> 6
>>>>>>>> 3
>>>>>>>> )
>>>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> org.apache.poi.poifs.filesystem.Ole10Native.createFromEmbeddedOleObje
>>>>>>>> c
>>>>>>>> t
>>>>>>>> (
>>>>>>>> Ole10Native.java:91)
>>>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> org.apache.poi.poifs.filesystem.Ole10Native.createFromEmbeddedOleObje
>>>>>>>> c
>>>>>>>> t
>>>>>>>> (
>>>>>>>> Ole10Native.java:63)
>>>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> org.apache.tika.parser.microsoft.ooxml.AbstractOOXMLExtractor.handleE
>>>>>>>> m
>>>>>>>> b
>>>>>>>> e
>>>>>>>> ddedOLE(AbstractOOXMLExtractor.java:250)
>>>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> org.apache.tika.parser.microsoft.ooxml.AbstractOOXMLExtractor.handleE
>>>>>>>> m
>>>>>>>> b
>>>>>>>> e
>>>>>>>> ddedParts(AbstractOOXMLExtractor.java:199)
>>>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> org.apache.tika.parser.microsoft.ooxml.AbstractOOXMLExtractor.getXHTM
>>>>>>>> L
>>>>>>>> (
>>>>>>>> A
>>>>>>>> bstractOOXMLExtractor.java:115)
>>>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> org.apache.tika.parser.microsoft.ooxml.OOXMLExtractorFactory.parse(OO
>>>>>>>> X
>>>>>>>> M
>>>>>>>> L
>>>>>>>> ExtractorFactory.java:112)
>>>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> org.apache.tika.parser.microsoft.ooxml.OOXMLParser.parse(OOXMLParser.
>>>>>>>> j
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>> v
>>>>>>>> a:82)
>>>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> org.apache.tika.parser.CompositeParser.parse(CompositeParser.java:243
>>>>>>>> )
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>> From: Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
>>>>>>>> [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 12:22 AM
>>>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>>>>>>> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Tika 1.6 release candidate #1
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hi Folks,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> A candidate for the Tika 1.6 release is available at:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mattmann/apache-tika-1.6/rc1/
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>     http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tika/tags/1.6/
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The SHA1 checksum of the archive is
>>>>>>>> 076ad343be56a540a4c8e395746fa4fda5b5b6d3.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> A Maven staging repository is available at:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetika-1003
>>>>>>>> /
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tika 1.6.
>>>>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> least three +1 Tika PMC votes are cast.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>     [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tika 1.6
>>>>>>>>     [ ] -1 Do not release this package becauseŠ
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thank you!
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Chris
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> P.S. Here is my +1!
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to