[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15131500#comment-15131500
]
Tim Allison edited comment on TIKA-1824 at 2/4/16 1:21 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------
bq. Perhaps add "parser(s?) to the artifactId
Y, sorry, [~bobpaulin], now that I see it, I'm changing my mind. I like the
suggestion of {{tika-parser-*}}.
If we don't need "tika" in the child module names, we could even go down to
something like:
* advanced-parsers
* cad-parsers
was (Author: [email protected]):
bq. Perhaps add "parser(s?) to the artifactId
Y, sorry, [~bobpaulin], now that I see it, I'm changing my mind...
Should we get rid of "tika-parser-" entirely, e.g.:
* advanced-module
* cad-module
or perhaps:
* advanced-parsers
* cad-parsers
> Tika 2.0 - Create Initial Parser Modules
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: TIKA-1824
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1824
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 2.0
> Reporter: Bob Paulin
> Assignee: Bob Paulin
>
> Create initial break down of parser modules.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
