[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15133821#comment-15133821
]
Konstantin Gribov edited comment on TIKA-1824 at 2/5/16 8:24 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I'm on vacation now, so reveiwed this topic only briefly. Greate work (y).
I would take a look at 2.x branch after I will return. Do mbox, outlook and
rfc822 parsers go to one module?
My +1 to prefixing {{artifactIds}} with {{tika-parser(s)\-\*}} or at least
{{tika\-\*}}. I personally prefer {{tika-parsers\-\*}} which is eloquent and
meaningfull name for artifact making Tika use simpler for downstream developers.
was (Author: grossws):
I'm on vacation now, so reveiwed this topic only briefly. Greate work (y).
I would take a look at 2.x branch after I will return. Do mbox, outlook and
rfc822 parsers go to one module?
My +1 to prefixing `artifactId`s with `tika-parser(s)-*` or at least `tika-*`.
I personally prefer `tika-parsers-*` which is eloquent and meaningfull name for
artifact making Tika use simpler for downstream developers.
> Tika 2.0 - Create Initial Parser Modules
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: TIKA-1824
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1824
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 2.0
> Reporter: Bob Paulin
> Assignee: Bob Paulin
>
> Create initial break down of parser modules.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
