[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15829856#comment-15829856
]
Matthew Caruana Galizia commented on TIKA-2245:
-----------------------------------------------
So should we agree that parsers should use ONLY JUL and rid it of slf4j and
log4j? Or should we standardise on slf4j?
> Standardise logging
> -------------------
>
> Key: TIKA-2245
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2245
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: parser
> Affects Versions: 1.14, 1.15
> Reporter: Matthew Caruana Galizia
> Labels: logging
>
> Tika parsers sometimes use Log4j's Logger, sometimes the JUL
> (java.util.logging) Logger and sometimes SLF4j.
> It would be better to standardise on a single facade, for the sake of not
> having to configure multiple loggers.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
