[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15830039#comment-15830039
]
Tim Allison commented on TIKA-2245:
-----------------------------------
bq. we can't get rid of slf4j-api
Y, agreed.
bq. it's better to avoid if no upstream deps use its api directly....I
personally prefer parsers to use slf4j-api
[~grossws], sounds like you wouldn't object to unifying the Tika code w/in
tika-parsers to use only JUL given the current status quo?
> Standardise logging
> -------------------
>
> Key: TIKA-2245
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2245
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: parser
> Affects Versions: 1.14, 1.15
> Reporter: Matthew Caruana Galizia
> Labels: logging
>
> Tika parsers sometimes use Log4j's Logger, sometimes the JUL
> (java.util.logging) Logger and sometimes SLF4j.
> It would be better to standardise on a single facade, for the sake of not
> having to configure multiple loggers.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
