Hey Tim, I’d like to try and get in: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1988
today for 15.1. I am working on integrating it now and adding some docs to the wiki. I’ll keep you posted. Cheers, Chris ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Principal Data Scientist, Engineering Administrative Office (3010) Manager, NSF & Open Source Projects Formulation and Development Offices (8212) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 180-503E, Mailstop: 180-503 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ On 6/28/17, 12:24 PM, "Allison, Timothy B." <talli...@mitre.org> wrote: POI is available on maven, and I just upgraded. Unless there are objections, I'll change our org.apache.tika.parser.sentiment.analysis.SentimentParser to org.apache.tika.parser.sentiment.analysis.SentimentAnalysisParser and we should be good to go for 1.15.1? Let me know if you'd like to hold off for a bit, but there's always 1.15.2. :) Cheers, Tim -----Original Message----- From: Mattmann, Chris A (3010) [mailto:chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 3:39 PM To: dev@tika.apache.org Subject: Re: Tika 1.15.1? Let me get back to you I’d like to see if we can get some progress on the Age Detector Parser ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Principal Data Scientist, Engineering Administrative Office (3010) Manager, NSF & Open Source Projects Formulation and Development Offices (8212) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 180-503E, Mailstop: 180-503 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ On 6/23/17, 10:01 AM, "Allison, Timothy B." <talli...@mitre.org> wrote: All, With the exception of the SentimentParser (which we have a path forward on), I think we're good to go. It looks like POI is about to kick off the release process for 3.17-beta1, and the batch results look good. I propose waiting a week or so to incorporate that. Anything else we need to get in for 1.15.1? Cheers, Tim -----Original Message----- From: Chris Mattmann [mailto:mattm...@apache.org] Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 2:43 PM To: dev@tika.apache.org Subject: Re: Tika 1.15.1? Yep agreed on both Tim. If I don’t get it done this weekend, we’ll apply the approach you mention below. Great seeing you yesterday! On 6/16/17, 11:40 AM, "Allison, Timothy B." <talli...@mitre.org> wrote: All, I'm hoping to wrap up the TEIParser next week (I'm thinking about modifying code to handle DOM)...and this should rid us of org.json licensing issues. Run a release for 1.15.1 probably the following week? Anything else we want to get in to 1.15.1? Chris, I'm not sure where you are on the SentimentParser. If there will be a quick fix, great; otherwise, we should be ok with the added exclusions (TIKA-2397) and if we rename the class in Tika so that we don't have a conflict over oat.parsers.SentimentParser (TIKA-2368). Cheers, Tim -----Original Message----- From: Tyler Bui-Palsulich [mailto:tbpalsul...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 8:39 PM To: dev@tika.apache.org Subject: Re: Tika 1.16? +1 to 1.15.1. It would also be nice to be able to have "cheap" security releases as they come up. Tyler On Jun 2, 2017 6:12 AM, "Bob Paulin" <b...@bobpaulin.com> wrote: > Would be breaking a bit from the current release numbering but I'd > fully support moving to semantic versioning. +1 to a 1.15.1 > > - Bob > > > On 6/2/2017 8:06 AM, Luís Filipe Nassif wrote: > > Maybe 1.15.1? > > > > Em 1 de jun de 2017 10:03 AM, "Bob Paulin" <b...@bobpaulin.com> escreveu: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> > >> On 6/1/2017 6:50 AM, Allison, Timothy B. wrote: > >>> Given the broken OSGi and the org.json issues with 1.15, does it > >>> make > >> sense to aim for 1.16 fairly soon, say 3-4 weeks? > >>> Cheers, > >>> > >>> Tim > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
