If we're adding features does it make sense just to bump to 1.16 rather than 1.15.1? Traditionally point releases would be bug fixes only [1].
- Bob [1] http://semver.org/ On 6/29/2017 1:18 PM, Allison, Timothy B. wrote: > K. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mattmann, Chris A (3010) [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 1:59 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Tika 1.15.1? > > Hey Tim, I’d like to try and get in: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1988 > > today for 15.1. I am working on integrating it now and adding some docs to > the wiki. > > I’ll keep you posted. > > Cheers, > Chris > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Principal Data Scientist, Engineering Administrative Office (3010) Manager, > NSF & Open Source Projects Formulation and Development Offices (8212) NASA > Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 180-503E, Mailstop: 180-503 > Email: [email protected] > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) Adjunct > Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern > California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > On 6/28/17, 12:24 PM, "Allison, Timothy B." <[email protected]> wrote: > > POI is available on maven, and I just upgraded. > > Unless there are objections, I'll change our > > org.apache.tika.parser.sentiment.analysis.SentimentParser > > to > > org.apache.tika.parser.sentiment.analysis.SentimentAnalysisParser > > and we should be good to go for 1.15.1? > > Let me know if you'd like to hold off for a bit, but there's always > 1.15.2. :) > > Cheers, > > Tim > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mattmann, Chris A (3010) [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 3:39 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Tika 1.15.1? > > Let me get back to you I’d like to see if we can get some progress on the > Age Detector Parser > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Principal Data Scientist, Engineering Administrative Office (3010) > Manager, NSF & Open Source Projects Formulation and Development Offices > (8212) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 180-503E, Mailstop: 180-503 > Email: [email protected] > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) Adjunct > Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern > California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > On 6/23/17, 10:01 AM, "Allison, Timothy B." <[email protected]> wrote: > > All, > With the exception of the SentimentParser (which we have a path > forward on), I think we're good to go. It looks like POI is about to kick > off the release process for 3.17-beta1, and the batch results look good. I > propose waiting a week or so to incorporate that. > Anything else we need to get in for 1.15.1? > > Cheers, > > Tim > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Mattmann [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 2:43 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Tika 1.15.1? > > Yep agreed on both Tim. If I don’t get it done this weekend, we’ll > apply the approach you mention below. > > Great seeing you yesterday! > > > > > On 6/16/17, 11:40 AM, "Allison, Timothy B." <[email protected]> > wrote: > > All, > > I'm hoping to wrap up the TEIParser next week (I'm thinking about > modifying code to handle DOM)...and this should rid us of org.json licensing > issues. Run a release for 1.15.1 probably the following week? > > Anything else we want to get in to 1.15.1? > > Chris, I'm not sure where you are on the SentimentParser. If > there will be a quick fix, great; otherwise, we should be ok with the added > exclusions (TIKA-2397) and if we rename the class in Tika so that we don't > have a conflict over oat.parsers.SentimentParser (TIKA-2368). > > Cheers, > > Tim > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tyler Bui-Palsulich [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 8:39 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Tika 1.16? > > +1 to 1.15.1. > > It would also be nice to be able to have "cheap" security > releases as they come up. > > Tyler > > On Jun 2, 2017 6:12 AM, "Bob Paulin" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Would be breaking a bit from the current release numbering but > I'd > > fully support moving to semantic versioning. +1 to a 1.15.1 > > > > - Bob > > > > > > On 6/2/2017 8:06 AM, Luís Filipe Nassif wrote: > > > Maybe 1.15.1? > > > > > > Em 1 de jun de 2017 10:03 AM, "Bob Paulin" > <[email protected]> escreveu: > > > > > >> +1 > > >> > > >> > > >> On 6/1/2017 6:50 AM, Allison, Timothy B. wrote: > > >>> Given the broken OSGi and the org.json issues with 1.15, > does it > > >>> make > > >> sense to aim for 1.16 fairly soon, say 3-4 weeks? > > >>> Cheers, > > >>> > > >>> Tim > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
