Roll forward! Yay!

 

 

 

From: Tim Allison <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, December 13, 2018 at 7:02 AM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: 1.20?

 

Reports are here:

 

http://162.242.228.174/reports/tika_1_20-pre-rc1.zip

 

I'm going to revert the mp4 parser, and commit the few dependency

upgrades I ran.

 

The _major_ difference in content for ppt is explained by the

duplication of header/footer info.  To confirm this, note that the

values for "num_unique_tokens_a" and "num_unique_tokens_b" are

identical for nearly all ppt->ppt, but there are far more tokens in

"num_tokens_a" vs "num_tokens_b".

 

I also see that we're losing content in x-java and x-groovy, etc., but

that's because we're now suppressing the style markup that our parser

was (incorrectly, IMHO, inserting) -- check the values in

"top_10_unique_token_diffs_a", e.g.: rgb: 15 | color: 14 | font: 9 |

0,0,0: 4 | background: 4 | 147,147,147: 3 | 247,247,247: 3 | bold: 3 |

weight: 3 | family: 2

 

In short, I think we're good to go.  Will roll rc1 later today or

(more likely) tomorrow unless there are objections.

On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 9:37 PM Tim Allison <[email protected]> wrote:

 

Any blockers on 1.20?  I'm going to kick off the regression tests shortly.

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 7:39 PM <[email protected]> wrote:

> 

> Hi,

> On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 at 13:00, Tim Allison <[email protected]> wrote:

> 

> > Dave,

> >   Should I try to get the Docker plugin working again?

> >

> 

> That would be great. I think I may have went down the wrong path building

> an image at package time, as there doesn't seem to be an easy way to

> publish it as an Apache labelled org on Dockerhub unless it builds from

> source.

> 

> I have some time over the weekend, so could update to where I got to and

> see what you think.

> 

> Cheers,

> Dave

 

Reply via email to