Reports on mp4s, junrar, msaccess and a random subset of the regression corpus are available here: http://162.242.228.174/reports/reports_tika_1_20-rc1_subset.tgz
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 5:34 PM Tim Allison <[email protected]> wrote: > > Let me actually take a look before answering. Sorry! > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 5:30 PM Tim Allison <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Thank you for reading the reports!!! >> >> The files are very likely broken. I can take a look. The change was >> probably because of an "upgrade" to junrar. Should I revert to the >> version we used in 1.19.1? >> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:34 PM Luís Filipe Nassif <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi Tim, >> > >> > Reading your great reports, I also saw some new exceptions with RAR files >> > in likely broken folder, but seems tika was able to extract some text from >> > them before. Do you know if those files are really broken and why tika >> > extracted text from them before? >> > >> > Thank you, >> > Luis >> > >> > Em qui, 13 de dez de 2018 às 13:02, Tim Allison <[email protected]> >> > escreveu: >> > >> > > Reports are here: >> > > >> > > http://162.242.228.174/reports/tika_1_20-pre-rc1.zip >> > > >> > > I'm going to revert the mp4 parser, and commit the few dependency >> > > upgrades I ran. >> > > >> > > The _major_ difference in content for ppt is explained by the >> > > duplication of header/footer info. To confirm this, note that the >> > > values for "num_unique_tokens_a" and "num_unique_tokens_b" are >> > > identical for nearly all ppt->ppt, but there are far more tokens in >> > > "num_tokens_a" vs "num_tokens_b". >> > > >> > > I also see that we're losing content in x-java and x-groovy, etc., but >> > > that's because we're now suppressing the style markup that our parser >> > > was (incorrectly, IMHO, inserting) -- check the values in >> > > "top_10_unique_token_diffs_a", e.g.: rgb: 15 | color: 14 | font: 9 | >> > > 0,0,0: 4 | background: 4 | 147,147,147: 3 | 247,247,247: 3 | bold: 3 | >> > > weight: 3 | family: 2 >> > > >> > > In short, I think we're good to go. Will roll rc1 later today or >> > > (more likely) tomorrow unless there are objections. >> > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 9:37 PM Tim Allison <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > Any blockers on 1.20? I'm going to kick off the regression tests >> > > shortly. >> > > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 7:39 PM <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > Hi, >> > > > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 at 13:00, Tim Allison <[email protected]> >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > Dave, >> > > > > > Should I try to get the Docker plugin working again? >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > That would be great. I think I may have went down the wrong path >> > > building >> > > > > an image at package time, as there doesn't seem to be an easy way to >> > > > > publish it as an Apache labelled org on Dockerhub unless it builds >> > > > > from >> > > > > source. >> > > > > >> > > > > I have some time over the weekend, so could update to where I got to >> > > and >> > > > > see what you think. >> > > > > >> > > > > Cheers, >> > > > > Dave >> > >
