Just got these build failures on Windows 10 JDK 11: [ERROR] Failures: [ERROR] TextAndCSVParserTest.testSubclassingMimeTypesRemain:217 expected:<...-vcalendar; charset=[ISO-8859-1]> but was:<...-vcalendar; charset=[windows-1252]> [ERROR] TXTParserTest.testSubclassingMimeTypesRemain:299 expected:<...-vcalendar; charset=[ISO-8859-1]> but was:<...-vcalendar; charset=[windows-1252]>
Em seg., 2 de mai. de 2022 às 08:15, Tim Allison <[email protected]> escreveu: > Thank you, Tilman! > > I'll give it a few more hours in case anyone wants to -1 it. > > On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 6:20 AM Tilman Hausherr <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > 👋 Go with what we have > > Tilman > > > > > > > > --- Original-Nachricht --- > > Von: Tim Allison > > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tika 1.28.2 Candidate #2 > > Datum: 02. Mai 2022, 12:15 > > An: <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > I confirmed my memory of TikaServerIntegrationTest. The difference is > > that in 1.x, we were still using threads to start the server and then > > hoping that<http://thread.interrupt> () actually shut the process down > in a > > reasonable amount of time. In 2.x, we're starting processes and then > > force quitting those after each test. In my experience, this got rid > > of the flaky tests in 2.x > > > > We didn't change any of the underlying server logic in 1.x. This is a > > problem of flaky tests. > > > > Given that we have the 1.x branch through September, I'll convert the > > thread based tests to process based tests shortly. The question is: > > should we roll an rc3 or go with what we have. > > > > Thank you, all. > > > > Best, > > > > Tim > > > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 9:10 AM Tim Allison <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > That's exactly my understanding as well. That test is not flaky in 2x > > > because of modifications I made to the integration tests in 2x. > > > > > > In 2x, the Solr tests can be flaky, and there's an open issue for > > > that. I don't like flaky tests. Sorry. > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 6:28 AM Tilman Hausherr <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Now I had successful builds with jdk11 and jdk18. I think this is > more > > a > > > > problem with the test than with the software. I remember when I > started > > > > with tika I wanted to make it possible to have tika1 and 2 work in > > > > parallel and never managed to do it and then moved on to other > things. > > > > Something about unreliability of the server starting and stopping. > > > > > > > > Tilman > > > > > > > > Am 30.04.2022 um 11:29 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: > > > > > [ERROR] Tests run: 12, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 2, Time > > > > > elapsed: 102.543 s <<< FAILURE! - in > > > > ><http://org.apache.tika.server.TikaServerIntegrationTest> > > > > > [ERROR] > > > > > > > < > http://org.apache.tika.server.TikaServerIntegrationTest.testSameServerIdAfterOOM > > > > > > > Time elapsed: 5.694 s <<< ERROR! > > > > ><http://java.lang.IllegalStateException> : Not a JSON Object: null > > > > > at > > > > > > > <http://org.apache.tika.server.TikaServerIntegrationTest.getServerId > (TikaServerIntegrationTest.java:280> > > ) > > > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > < > http://org.apache.tika.server.TikaServerIntegrationTest.testSameServerIdAfterOOM > (TikaServerIntegrationTest.java:208> > > ) > > > > > > > > > > W10, jdk11, maven 3.8.5 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
