[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-4512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18032177#comment-18032177
 ] 

Tim Allison commented on TIKA-4512:
-----------------------------------

The draft PR now works through {{{}tika-core-tests{}}}. Some things of concern:
 * The json everywhere thing mentioned above
 * There are now two config files – one tika-config.xml for all the parsers, 
detectors and other legacy components and one plugins.json to deal with all the 
plugins/pipes components. This feels ugly...perhaps we move to all json by Tika 
5.x :D
 * I've had to do some hackery to be able to test tika-pipes-core with the 
file-system-fetcher. I think it is really important to use actual plugin 
artifacts in tests rather than relying on the "development mode" of pf4j.
 * I'm not sure if we should rely on the parent project's databind or if we 
should put that in every plugin (which I don't like).

> Experiment with pf4j for tika-pipes
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TIKA-4512
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-4512
>             Project: Tika
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Tim Allison
>            Priority: Major
>
> This is proof of concept work based on [~ndipiazza] 's TIKA-4272-docker 
> branch.
> I really like a lot of that work.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to