Is that worth a respin? I think the .mvn directory that made .src.zip unbuildable is higher priority and might trigger a respin.
Let me know what you think. On Wed, Jul 1, 2026 at 11:23 AM Nicholas DiPiazza <[email protected]> wrote: > > https://github.com/apache/tika/pull/2919 is merged. can we fire up another > rc? > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 2:43 PM Oleg Tikhonov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hey, > > m1, java 17 > > Managed to work by attached patch > > +1 > > > > Cheers, > > Oleg > > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 10:08 PM Tim Allison <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> A candidate for the Tika 4.0.0-beta-1 release is available at: > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tika/4.0.0-beta-1 > >> > >> The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: > >> https://github.com/apache/tika/tree/4.0.0-beta-1-rc1/ > >> > >> The SHA-512 checksum of the archive is > >> > >> 24b37cfefb4c085b0c11ee6ec4aafce8836c05e6d7d5f37143492cd789abc303c208f70e499e9a84be50e49e019d40a76cacb1bfce27e73abbaefd3eddbc96ea. > >> > >> In addition, a staged maven repository is available here: > >> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetika-1127/org/apache/tika > >> > >> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tika 4.0.0-beta-1. > >> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > >> least three +1 Tika PMC votes are cast. > >> > >> *NOTE:* we think we fixed the locations for the zips (dist.apache.org) > >> vs the thin jars (maven). Please confirm that the expected artifacts > >> went to the right destination. For beta-1, we are intentionally only > >> packaging tika-grpc as a Docker image. > >> > >> Here's my +1. > >> > >> Thank you, all! > >> > >> Best, > >> > >> Tim > >> > >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tika 4.0.0-beta-1 > >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... > >> > >
