Not worth a spin by itself.

On Wed, Jul 1, 2026, 10:28 AM Tim Allison <[email protected]> wrote:

> Is that worth a respin? I think the .mvn directory that made .src.zip
> unbuildable is higher priority and might trigger a respin.
>
> Let me know what you think.
>
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2026 at 11:23 AM Nicholas DiPiazza
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/tika/pull/2919 is merged. can we fire up
> another
> > rc?
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 2:43 PM Oleg Tikhonov <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hey,
> > > m1, java 17
> > > Managed to work by attached patch
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Oleg
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 10:08 PM Tim Allison <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> A candidate for the Tika 4.0.0-beta-1 release is available at:
> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tika/4.0.0-beta-1
> > >>
> > >> The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
> > >> https://github.com/apache/tika/tree/4.0.0-beta-1-rc1/
> > >>
> > >> The SHA-512 checksum of the archive is
> > >>
> > >>
> 24b37cfefb4c085b0c11ee6ec4aafce8836c05e6d7d5f37143492cd789abc303c208f70e499e9a84be50e49e019d40a76cacb1bfce27e73abbaefd3eddbc96ea.
> > >>
> > >> In addition, a staged maven repository is available here:
> > >>
> > >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetika-1127/org/apache/tika
> > >>
> > >> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tika 4.0.0-beta-1.
> > >> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> > >> least three +1 Tika PMC votes are cast.
> > >>
> > >> *NOTE:* we think we fixed the locations for the zips (dist.apache.org
> )
> > >> vs the thin jars (maven). Please confirm that the expected artifacts
> > >> went to the right destination. For beta-1, we are intentionally only
> > >> packaging tika-grpc as a Docker image.
> > >>
> > >> Here's my +1.
> > >>
> > >> Thank you, all!
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >>
> > >>             Tim
> > >>
> > >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tika 4.0.0-beta-1
> > >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > >>
> > >
>

Reply via email to