Can we remove/rename util packages... I'd be more comfortable seeing the Util classes treated as peer classes residing in the packages where are primarily used (and ofc then be package-protected if possible).
I think this comes under a general good practice where package tangles in project are a lot easier to avoid if packages are named based off functionality rather than on type. (Functionality is grouped but types exist throughout). So i'm wondering if there isn't objection if it's a good opportunity now to do it, starting with tiles-request-api. For example in tiles-request-api if we move everything in the util package back to the request package, and also ContextResolver up to the request package we completely untangle that submodule. ~mck -- "The only thing I know, is that I know nothing." Socrates | http://tech.finn.no | http://github.com/finn-no |
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
