On 12-03-01 05:53 PM, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 17:10 -0500, Nicolas LE BAS wrote:
- Another aspect is the web site, with 2 kinds of documentation: dev and
user. Dev doc needs to account for the new spin-off projects autotag and
request, as well as minor updates (Java 6.0...). User doc should need
some writing for new "request" and "autotag" projects, and only a simple
review for the main "framework" project.
Can this be done post 3.0 release? Or is too much of it part of the
maven built site which becomes fixed once 3.0 is released?
This is indeed the maven built site I'm talking about. But even if it
were not built by maven, IMHO documentation is an important part of a
public release.
But since release quality is determined by vote, I suppose the answer
really depends on the voters.
- updating tiles-showcase: have we even had a look at it?
no :-/
Does it also need to be *in* the 3.0 release, or can it be done
afterwards?
Well, it can probably be postponed. There is no technical reason to
release it at the same time, but it could help providing good examples
for the doc.
I didn't look into the effort involved either. It might be easy.
Nick
