On 12-03-05 07:31 PM, Nicolas LE BAS wrote:
On 12-03-01 05:53 PM, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 17:10 -0500, Nicolas LE BAS wrote:
- I'm having a hard time running "mvn clean site:stage" and have all the
reports available. Some checkstyle and emma reports are missing, and jxr
reports are generated but not staged. Perhaps I'm not doing it right...
but I guess this would be our first task.
You need to use maven-3 for site.
Well, it's still difficult (although better):
- dependency reports are missing (but then they are missing on the web
site, too:
http://tiles.apache.org/request/tiles-request-api/dependencies.html)
- emma coverage reports and source xref are generated in the target
directory of each module but not staged.
I'm using (running java 6 to get the UML diagrams included in the
javadoc, but oracle java 7 has the same problems):
tiles-request $ JAVA_HOME="/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk" mvn -version
Apache Maven 3.0.3 (r1075438; 2011-02-28 12:31:09-0500)
Maven home: /usr/local/maven
Java version: 1.6.0_20, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
Java home: /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre
Default locale: en_CA, platform encoding: UTF-8
OS name: "linux", version: "2.6.32-38-generic", arch: "amd64", family:
"unix"
tiles-request $ JAVA_HOME="/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk" mvn
-Dmaven.test.skip=false clean javadoc:jar sources:jar package site:stage
Adding -Pmaven-3 yields the same results.
Did you run into those same problems when deploying the site earlier?
Nick
Here's how I finally got it working:
- replacing org.apache.tiles:tiles-master:3 by org.apache:apache:9
directly (hence using the versions provided by the ASF for all plugins):
fixes the missing dependencies report.
- replacing org.codehaus.mojo:jxr-maven-plugin by
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jxr-plugin : fixes the missing XREFs.
- replacing emma-maven-plugin by cobertura-maven-plugin: fixes the
missing test coverage report, although it's using a different tool.
Now I'm wondering about the best way to do it. I guess removing
tiles-master would be a bad practice, so we would need to release a new
version of it. How do we do that?
Besides, are those changes OK with you?
Nick.
