On 12-05-08 04:18 PM, Greg Reddin wrote:
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Nicolas LE BAS<[email protected]> wrote:
- the web site of the released version available at
http://tiles.apache.org/framework, http://tiles.apache.org/tiles-autotag,
http://tiles.apache.org/tiles-request.
This one is tricky. I'm not sure if we should push these out to the
sites before a vote.
OTOH website doc sort of goes through peer review before the release
is rolled and we don't necessarily vote on the site before it's
published. I'm not sure. Do others have an opinion? I don't remember
us doing this in the past.
Greg
I like what Mck said, that we can always redeploy the web site to fix
any mistake, as opposed to maven artifacts cached from the central
repository.
On the other hand, I'm not sure how the peer review happens; commit
messages allow people to check the contents of each page by reading the
apt pages, but you have to actually build the site to see some aspects
of it (maven reports, broken links...). I wonder if reviewers would like
to have a prebuilt website before the review.
Nick
