Labor Day - true. I'm fine with 9/6 - I'd probably be the one initiating the vote and I doubt i'd get to do that on the holiday so 9/6 is more likely.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Ted Wilmes <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > I think 9/5 is Labor Day. I'm wondering if we should keep the freeze on > 8/27 but move > the start of vote to 9/6. Not a big deal, but maybe some more folks > (non-committers) would > be around and see the vote thread started up if they wanted to test things > out. As far as > shorter release cycles going forward, I think that makes good sense. > > Thanks, > Ted > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > When we went through vote on 3.1.3/3.2.1, we'd discussed releasing > > 3.2.2/3.1.4 on a shorter release period than normal. A shorter release > > cycle for these two versions would allow us to quickly address a bug or > two > > found late in code freeze. Perhaps longer term, shorter release cycles > > might help produce less stress around getting PRs in for code freeze as > > there would be an expectation that another release would follow with > > reasonable speed. > > > > I'd like to propose that we start code freeze 8/27 and go to vote on 9/5. > > I'll just mention that I could only see those dates slipping a little bit > > if TINKERPOP-1278 runs into troubles, but right now I think that's on > track > > to get merged back to master in time for that deadline. > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Stephen > > >
