I too am fine with the proposed dates.
Thanks
Pieter
Excerpts from Stephen Mallette's message of August 10, 2016 3:55 :
Labor Day - true. I'm fine with 9/6 - I'd probably be the one initiating
the vote and I doubt i'd get to do that on the holiday so 9/6 is more
likely.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Ted Wilmes <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello,
I think 9/5 is Labor Day. I'm wondering if we should keep the freeze on
8/27 but move
the start of vote to 9/6. Not a big deal, but maybe some more folks
(non-committers) would
be around and see the vote thread started up if they wanted to test things
out. As far as
shorter release cycles going forward, I think that makes good sense.
Thanks,
Ted
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]>
wrote:
> When we went through vote on 3.1.3/3.2.1, we'd discussed releasing
> 3.2.2/3.1.4 on a shorter release period than normal. A shorter release
> cycle for these two versions would allow us to quickly address a bug or
two
> found late in code freeze. Perhaps longer term, shorter release cycles
> might help produce less stress around getting PRs in for code freeze as
> there would be an expectation that another release would follow with
> reasonable speed.
>
> I'd like to propose that we start code freeze 8/27 and go to vote on 9/5.
> I'll just mention that I could only see those dates slipping a little bit
> if TINKERPOP-1278 runs into troubles, but right now I think that's on
track
> to get merged back to master in time for that deadline.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stephen
>
