[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15940558#comment-15940558
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1625:
-------------------------------------------
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/578
sorry - i still gotta fix that on tp32. i didn't get to it yesterday.
> Improvements to has() related steps
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-1625
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1625
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: process
> Affects Versions: 3.2.3
> Reporter: stephen mallette
>
> A number of issues related to {{has()}} prefixes steps:
> * Review {{has()}} for missing tests. {{hasKey}} for example has no tests
> * Improve documentation for {{has}} in general. The short descriptions are
> confusing and don't always make usage clear.
> ** Example: "hasKey(keys...): Remove the traverser if its property does not
> have any of the keys." - not clear that this means
> {{g.V().properties().hasKey("name")}} and not
> {{g.V().properties().hasKey("location")}}
> * Ensure consistency in the parameter names
> ** Example: {{hasKeys(keys...)}} is referenced in the docs, but in the code
> it is: {{hasKey(label, otherLabels)}}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
