JanusGraph was added a while ago - I believe as soon as the first release dropped.
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Jing Chen (Jerry) He <[email protected]> wrote: > FYI > > JanusGraph has had two official releases now: > > https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/releases/ > > Thanks, > > Jerry > > On 2017-02-06 06:53 (-0700), Marko Rodriguez <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I think they should have one official release first. Right now its just > source code and we shouldn’t set a precedence that deviates from our policy. > > > > Marko. > > > > http://markorodriguez.com > > > > > > > > > On Feb 6, 2017, at 6:59 AM, Daniel Kuppitz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Knowing where JanusGraph is coming from, I don't think we need an > official > > > release to get it listed. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Daniel > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> There was recently a request from Alexander Patrikalakis in JIRA (that > > >> issues is now closed in favor of this thread) to add JanusGraph to the > > >> provider index of the TinkerPop home page. I think that makes sense, > though > > >> at this time JanusGraph hasn't made a release yet that I'm aware of > which > > >> basically means that it's not quite yet in compliance with our listing > > >> policies. > > >> > > >> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/policy.html > > >> > > >> We don't always enforce those policies to the letter of their wording > (thus > > >> far they have been more like general guidelines) and I assume that a > > >> JanusGraph release is likely a reasonably high priority right now for > that > > >> project. > > >> > > >> Anyone have any strong feelings one way or another on adding > JanusGraph > > >> given our policies? > > >> > > > > >
