This is one. I pushed the changes to tp32/ and master/. I only found (and fixed) 2 minor issues, where my script produced a little formatting mess.
Cheers, Daniel On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> wrote: > For whatever reason we started writing our headers in our docs with: > > Header > ====== > > Subheader > --------- > > SubSubHeader > ~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > as opposed to the alternative: > > = This Is A Header > > == Subheader > > === SubSubHeader > > The downside with the first approach is that it forces us to do two things: > > 1. Remember the syntax for each header layer (which we all probably know > pretty well at this point, but still...) > 2. Ensure that the width of the header formatting line is equal to the > length of the text above it. > > That second point is a killer sometimes. While I've trained myself to be > good at noticing that problem I know it's bitten us in releases over and > over and over again. > > Anyway, I think going to the alternative formatting would be better and > propose to do a full reformatting. Please let me know if there are any > concerns about doing that - if I don't hear back in the next few days I'll > proceed with the changes. > > Thanks, > > Stephen >
