Looks like master CHANGELOG picked up a conflict... <<<<<<< HEAD == TinkerPop 3.3.0 (Gremlin Symphony #40 in G Minor) . . .
== TinkerPop 3.2.0 (Nine Inch Gremlins) ======= == TinkerPop 3.2.0 (Nine Inch Gremlins) >>>>>>> asciidoc-header Robert Dale On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Daniel Kuppitz <[email protected]> wrote: > Ah, good find! That's the same issue I've had in the reference docs and > recipes. Fixed. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Robert Dale <[email protected]> wrote: > > > git grep "== ==" > > > > Robert Dale > > > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Robert Dale <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I see things like '== ==>6' in docs/src/upgrade/release-3.2. > > > x-incubating.html > > > > > > Robert Dale > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Robert Dale <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > >> ^d > > >> > > >> Robert Dale > > >> > > >> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Daniel Kuppitz <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> > > >>> This is one. I pushed the changes to tp32/ and master/. I only found > > (and > > >>> fixed) 2 minor issues, where my script produced a little formatting > > mess. > > >>> > > >>> Cheers, > > >>> Daniel > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Stephen Mallette < > > [email protected]> > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > For whatever reason we started writing our headers in our docs > with: > > >>> > > > >>> > Header > > >>> > ====== > > >>> > > > >>> > Subheader > > >>> > --------- > > >>> > > > >>> > SubSubHeader > > >>> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > >>> > > > >>> > as opposed to the alternative: > > >>> > > > >>> > = This Is A Header > > >>> > > > >>> > == Subheader > > >>> > > > >>> > === SubSubHeader > > >>> > > > >>> > The downside with the first approach is that it forces us to do two > > >>> things: > > >>> > > > >>> > 1. Remember the syntax for each header layer (which we all probably > > >>> know > > >>> > pretty well at this point, but still...) > > >>> > 2. Ensure that the width of the header formatting line is equal to > > the > > >>> > length of the text above it. > > >>> > > > >>> > That second point is a killer sometimes. While I've trained myself > to > > >>> be > > >>> > good at noticing that problem I know it's bitten us in releases > over > > >>> and > > >>> > over and over again. > > >>> > > > >>> > Anyway, I think going to the alternative formatting would be better > > and > > >>> > propose to do a full reformatting. Please let me know if there are > > any > > >>> > concerns about doing that - if I don't hear back in the next few > days > > >>> I'll > > >>> > proceed with the changes. > > >>> > > > >>> > Thanks, > > >>> > > > >>> > Stephen > > >>> > > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >
