[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16380798#comment-16380798
 ] 

Roman Kreisel commented on TINKERPOP-1906:
------------------------------------------

Hi Stephen,

thank you for your quick response - I wasn't aware there is already a 
discussion running.

Anyway - the discussion even mentions ResponseStatus.Attributes - i think the 
absolute minimum would be to add the ResponseStatus to the ResponseException. 
Even right now, this would already help, since it would at least give the 
developers access to the HTTP Status. (Unless the "techical stuff" like HTTP 
code should be hidden/encapsulated)

> Make ResponseException explorable
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-1906
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1906
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: dotnet
>    Affects Versions: 3.2.7
>            Reporter: Roman Kreisel
>            Priority: Major
>
> The ResponseException from Gremlin.NET doesn't give you any possibility to 
> react on the GremlinService's Response. The only content is the exception's 
> Message, which is just free text.
> It would be great, to add some fields to expose at least the HTTP ErrorCode 
> or anything else that's responded by the service.
>  
> Especially, if you're using Gremlin.NET with Azure's Cosmos DB, there's a 
> "Request Rate to Large" response, in case you have high load on your 
> database. In such a case, you want to be able to detect this "error" and just 
> retry after a few milliseconds (i'm not sure, but i think even a proposal for 
> this retry-timeout is given in the response)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to