[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16380840#comment-16380840
]
Florian Hockmann commented on TINKERPOP-1906:
---------------------------------------------
Hi Roman,
I was just hoping that you had a stack trace (or were able to produce one) as
that should contain the actual status code in its message. A status code of 429
would be problematic as that's not a status code we're expecting from a Gremlin
Server, but then you shouldn't get a {{ResponseException}} in the first place.
So it has to be another status code since you mentioned in the issue
description that the exception you are seeing is actually a
{{ResponseException}}.
> Make ResponseException explorable
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-1906
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1906
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: dotnet
> Affects Versions: 3.2.7
> Reporter: Roman Kreisel
> Priority: Major
>
> The ResponseException from Gremlin.NET doesn't give you any possibility to
> react on the GremlinService's Response. The only content is the exception's
> Message, which is just free text.
> It would be great, to add some fields to expose at least the HTTP ErrorCode
> or anything else that's responded by the service.
>
> Especially, if you're using Gremlin.NET with Azure's Cosmos DB, there's a
> "Request Rate to Large" response, in case you have high load on your
> database. In such a case, you want to be able to detect this "error" and just
> retry after a few milliseconds (i'm not sure, but i think even a proposal for
> this retry-timeout is given in the response)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
