[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16433529#comment-16433529
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1927:
-------------------------------------------

Github user jorgebay commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/834
  
    Great!
    VOTE +1


> Gherkin scenario expects list with duplicates, but receives g:Set
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-1927
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1927
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: dotnet, javascript, python, test-suite
>    Affects Versions: 3.3.1
>            Reporter: Florian Hockmann
>            Assignee: stephen mallette
>            Priority: Major
>
> The scenario 
> {{g_V_storeXaX_byXoutEXcreatedX_countX_out_out_storeXaX_byXinEXcreatedX_weight_sumX}}
>  expects
> {code:java}
> | result |
> | d[1].l |
> | d[1].l |
> | d[0].l |
> | d[0].l |
> | d[0].l |
> | d[2].l |
> | d[1.0].d |
> | d[1.0].d |
> {code}
> but we receive this from the server:
> {code:java}
> {
>     "@type": "g:Set",
>     "@value": [
>         {
>             "@type": "g:Int64",
>             "@value": 1
>         },
>         {
>             "@type": "g:Int64",
>             "@value": 1
>         },
>         {
>             "@type": "g:Int64",
>             "@value": 0
>         },
>         {
>             "@type": "g:Int64",
>             "@value": 0
>         },
>         {
>             "@type": "g:Int64",
>             "@value": 0
>         },
>         {
>             "@type": "g:Int64",
>             "@value": 2
>         },
>         {
>             "@type": "g:Double",
>             "@value": 1
>         },
>         {
>             "@type": "g:Double",
>             "@value": 1
>         }
>     ]
> }
> {code}
> The set returned by the server contains 4 duplicates that shouldn't be part 
> of the expected result in the scenario.
> Unfortunately, while working on TINKERPOP-1865 we noticed that gremlin-python 
> and gremlin-javascript fail when the scenario is fixed like that. So those 
> two GLVs probably need to be fixed to handle {{g:Set}} correctly.
> After fixing the scenario, it can be removed from the list of ignored 
> scenarios in Gremlin.Net.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to