Github user ashwini-ms commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/868
  
    @jorgebay  and  
@FlorianHockmann<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FFlorianHockmann&data=02%7C01%7Cashwsing%40microsoft.com%7C856d53d68d0a4bfad4ea08d5c5ff16c8%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636632621740995185&sdata=ITQC9ta9GUYUWCx8%2BAeEtspe1Innqo8rsolRlGR1olY%3D&reserved=0>
 , Thanks  for taking a look at this. I will update the review comment soon.
    
    Thanks
    Ashwini
    
    From: Jorge Bay Gondra <[email protected]>
    Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 12:30 AM
    To: apache/tinkerpop <[email protected]>
    Cc: Ashwini Singh <[email protected]>; Mention 
<[email protected]>
    Subject: Re: [apache/tinkerpop] Tinkerpop 1913 (#868)
    
    
    @jorgebay commented on this pull request.
    
    Its looking good to me, I've included a couple of remark below.
    
    I agree with 
@FlorianHockmann<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FFlorianHockmann&data=02%7C01%7Cashwsing%40microsoft.com%7C856d53d68d0a4bfad4ea08d5c5ff16c8%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636632621740995185&sdata=ITQC9ta9GUYUWCx8%2BAeEtspe1Innqo8rsolRlGR1olY%3D&reserved=0>
 that IGremlinClient should return instances of ResultSet<T>.
    
    Going one step further, we should consider exposing IResultSet<T> and hide 
the actual implementation.
    
    ________________________________
    
    In 
gremlin-dotnet/src/Gremlin.Net/Driver/ResultSet.cs<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Ftinkerpop%2Fpull%2F868%23discussion_r191660636&data=02%7C01%7Cashwsing%40microsoft.com%7C856d53d68d0a4bfad4ea08d5c5ff16c8%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636632621740995185&sdata=39hJ6TQ9W5fI%2FLWFHqbAO90zIiLv6KerR3B8uKVZ3U4%3D&reserved=0>:
    
    > +        /// <summary>Returns an enumerator that iterates through a 
collection.</summary>
    
    +        /// <returns>An <see cref="T:System.Collections.IEnumerator" /> 
object that can be used to iterate through the collection.</returns>
    
    +        IEnumerator IEnumerable.GetEnumerator()
    
    +        {
    
    +            return this.GetEnumerator();
    
    +        }
    
    +
    
    +        /// <summary>Gets the number of elements in the 
collection.</summary>
    
    +        /// <returns>The number of elements in the collection. </returns>
    
    +        public int Count => this.Data.Count;
    
    +    }
    
    +
    
    +    /// <summary>
    
    +    /// Extension for IReadOnlyCollection
    
    +    /// </summary>
    
    +    public static class ResultSetExtensions
    
    Can we hide this from the public API?
    
    ________________________________
    
    In 
gremlin-dotnet/src/Gremlin.Net/Driver/Connection.cs<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Ftinkerpop%2Fpull%2F868%23discussion_r191665300&data=02%7C01%7Cashwsing%40microsoft.com%7C856d53d68d0a4bfad4ea08d5c5ff16c8%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636632621741005190&sdata=k4WDPT9T0kDODzmtr%2F9riB59fTLa7XJ09oNgmXDmHbg%3D&reserved=0>:
    
    > @@ -114,11 +116,18 @@ internal class Connection : IConnection
    
                                 result.Add(d);
    
                             }
    
                     }
    
    +
    
    +                if (status.Code == ResponseStatusCode.Success || 
status.Code == ResponseStatusCode.NoContent)
    
    +                {
    
    +                    statusAttributes = receivedMsg.Status.Attributes;
    
    Anything we expose should be agnostic to the serialization format. Status 
attributes should not be dependent on how GraphSON3 composes the response.
    
    In this case, we are exposing a dictionary containing @type and @value, 
where @value is a JArray (a third party type).
    
    Furthermore, we should hide any third party types from our API, see 
TINKERPOP-1696 for example.
    
    —
    You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
    Reply to this email directly, view it on 
GitHub<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Ftinkerpop%2Fpull%2F868%23pullrequestreview-124271408&data=02%7C01%7Cashwsing%40microsoft.com%7C856d53d68d0a4bfad4ea08d5c5ff16c8%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636632621741005190&sdata=VUpaUzlw8Ei%2FLXyVCWcBW3P5LwS6C4zDEjEN9ZMKU4M%3D&reserved=0>,
 or mute the 
thread<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FAdcfc3cynNQU68Dpr6Dsn0nCyaBjSrT4ks5t3kpdgaJpZM4T-UoQ&data=02%7C01%7Cashwsing%40microsoft.com%7C856d53d68d0a4bfad4ea08d5c5ff16c8%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636632621741015194&sdata=DRRufkXAqep19e%2F9QFMLqiwhaDXOoPkv3BH0urpk96o%3D&reserved=0>.



---

Reply via email to