that's a good point. i'd forgotten you'd mentioned that limitation on the users list. that might be a ding to the notion of it meeting the listing requirements actually....
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 9:37 AM Joshua Shinavier <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't know if I would could a tool that does not (yet) implement basic > steps like E() as "powered by Gremlin", but it seems to me that the hard > part (building a nice GUI for constructing graphs and running traversals, > that does already construct graphs and let you run certain traversals) is > already done. After the missing pieces are added, this will be a great > asset to new graph users, and even a handy tool for experienced ones. I > imagine the usual toy graphs could be added with little trouble. > > So... conditional +1. > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 2:28 PM Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > The http://gremlify.com/ website was recently announced on > gremlin-users: > > > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/gremlin-users/BDmWtfInTl4/e5F84qNkDgAJ > > > > It's young but I think it satisfies our requirements for listing in the > > Powered By section of our homepage. Unless there are objections in the > next > > 72 hours, I will assume lazy consensus and get it added. > > >
