i held off adding gremlinfy.com to the list when I first proposed but it is looking a bit snazzier these days. Here's the fresh announcement on gremlin-users:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/gremlin-users/R5mK9VVeXY0 On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 1:11 PM Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> wrote: > that's a good point. i'd forgotten you'd mentioned that limitation on the > users list. that might be a ding to the notion of it meeting the listing > requirements actually.... > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 9:37 AM Joshua Shinavier <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I don't know if I would could a tool that does not (yet) implement basic >> steps like E() as "powered by Gremlin", but it seems to me that the hard >> part (building a nice GUI for constructing graphs and running traversals, >> that does already construct graphs and let you run certain traversals) is >> already done. After the missing pieces are added, this will be a great >> asset to new graph users, and even a handy tool for experienced ones. I >> imagine the usual toy graphs could be added with little trouble. >> >> So... conditional +1. >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 2:28 PM Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > The http://gremlify.com/ website was recently announced on >> gremlin-users: >> > >> > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/gremlin-users/BDmWtfInTl4/e5F84qNkDgAJ >> > >> > It's young but I think it satisfies our requirements for listing in the >> > Powered By section of our homepage. Unless there are objections in the >> next >> > 72 hours, I will assume lazy consensus and get it added. >> > >> >
