[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2432?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17210454#comment-17210454
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-2432:
-------------------------------------------
spmallette commented on pull request #1341:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1341#issuecomment-705823170
Our review/merge procedures require either:
1. 3 +1s from committers OR
2. At least a single +1 from a committer and 7 day open wait period for
comment
https://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/current/dev/developer/#rtc
i will look at this in more detail tomorrow (and hopefully @jorgebay will
have time to get a second look) but I sense you have things in pretty good
order now.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
> Generate correct toString() representation of bytecode in Javascript
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-2432
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2432
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: javascript
> Affects Versions: 3.4.8
> Reporter: Serg Salo
> Priority: Minor
>
> I have a very simple task - generate bytecode using typescript traversal.
> for example:
> const g = new Graph().traversal();
> const q = g.V().hasLabel("airport").where(__.outE("route").hasId(7753));
> const query = new translator("g" as any);
> const bytecode = q.getBytecode();
> console.log(`Bytecode: ${bytecode.toString()}`);
>
> Here is what is generated:
>
> Bytecode:
> [["V"],["hasLabel","airport"],["where",\{"graph":null,"traversalStrategies":null,"bytecode":{"sourceInstructions":[],"stepInstructions":[["outE","route"],["hasId",7753]]},"traversers":null,"sideEffects":null,"_traversalStrategiesPromise":null,"_traversersIteratorIndex":0}]]
>
> Looks like it does the first level serialization correct, but the second
> level isn't properly serialized.
>
> any suggestions what is wrong with this code?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
