[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17221360#comment-17221360
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-2389:
-------------------------------------------
spmallette commented on a change in pull request #1308:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1308#discussion_r512640267
##########
File path:
gremlin-server/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/server/handler/HttpGremlinEndpointHandler.java
##########
@@ -189,6 +191,12 @@ public void channelRead(final ChannelHandlerContext ctx,
final Object msg) {
try {
logger.debug("Processing request containing script [{}] and
bindings of [{}] on {}",
requestArguments.getValue0(),
requestArguments.getValue1(), Thread.currentThread().getName());
+ if (settings.enableAuditLog) {
Review comment:
I haven't thought this through at all but is it desirable that we would
double-log here if the user has somehow used both settings (the new and
deprecated one as `true`)? I see this sort of code in the
`AbstractEvalOpProcessor` as well. Perhaps setting both to `true` should be
considered an "illegal" configuration or the setting of the new one to `true`
should override the old to `false`? Perhaps, setting the old to `true` and the
new to `false` should result in a WARN to the logger to let them know they are
using a deprecated settings?
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
> Authorization support in TinkerPop
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-2389
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2389
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: server
> Affects Versions: 3.4.7
> Reporter: Shekhar Bansal
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: Screenshot 2020-06-25 at 15.15.04.png
>
>
> Use case:
> # Tinkerpop supports multiple graphs using a single API and admin might want
> to restrict access to some of the graphs.
> # Admin might want to restrict read/write access to certain users.
>
> Proposal
> Add read/write access restrictions at graph level. We can extend it to
> executing scripts by adding execute privileges.
>
> Changes required
> Add `authorizer` block similar to `authentication` block in yaml file
>
> {code:java}
> authorization: {
> authorizer:
> org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.server.authorization.AllowAllAuthorizer,
> authorizationHandler:
> org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.server.handler.SaslAuthorizationHandler,
> config: {
> }
> }{code}
>
> Authorization will be done only if authentication is enabled. Authentication
> is done at per session basis while authorization will be done for each and
> every request.
> In `SaslAuthorizationHandler` or `HttpAuthorizationHandler` query will be
> parsed and depending on the step instructions, the query will be marked as of
> type read or write and then privilege evaluation will be done by calling
> `isAccessAllowed` method of `Authorizer`
> {code:java}
> public interface Authorizer {
> /**
> * Whether or not the authorization requires check.
> * If false will not authorzie user.
> */
> public boolean requireAuthorization();
> /**
> * Setup is called once upon system startup to initialize the {@code
> Authorizer}.
> */
> public void setup(final Map<String, Object> config);
> /**
> * A "standard" authorization implementation
> */
> public boolean isAccessAllowed(AuthorizationRequest authorizationRequest)
> throws AuthorizationException;
> }
> {code}
> Access policies can be defined in tools like `Apache Ranger`, sample policy:
> !Screenshot 2020-06-25 at 15.15.04.png|width=1017,height=548!
>
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
