[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17676982#comment-17676982
]
Zeyang Zhuang edited comment on TINKERPOP-2851 at 1/15/23 6:21 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear [~krlawrence] , haven't heard from you for quite a long time. I used the
TinkerPop Java Provider and also the gremlin console to reproduce the bugs. Can
you further help me confirm this problem? I suggest there're some problems in
the path traversal.
was (Author: JIRAUSER298627):
Hi, haven't heard from you for quite a long time. I used the TinkerPop Java
Provider and also the gremlin console to reproduce the bugs. Can you further
help me confirm this problem? I suggest there're some problems in the path
traversal.
> TinkerPop could not deal with correct path traversal results
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-2851
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2851
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: process
> Affects Versions: 3.4.10, 3.6.1
> Environment: Version: 3.4.10
> Storage Backend: in-memory
> Reporter: Zeyang Zhuang
> Priority: Major
>
> - Expected Behavior:
> We construct the following scenario: x equals count nodes(A->B) path numbers,
> y equals count nodes(B->C) path numbers, z equals count(A->B->C) path
> numbers. Then z should equal to x*y.
> We generate graph schema and data based on random strings and values. We
> build the graph with 100 vertexes, 200 edges, 20 vertex labels, and 20 edge
> labels.
> `g.V().id()` is used to get the node ids of the graph, then can use for loop
> to traverse all the nodes. Here is one of our examples executed.
> 1) `g.V(46).repeat(out().simplePath()).until(hasId(0)).path().size()` return 9
> 2) `g.V(0).repeat(out().simplePath()).until(hasId(276)).path().size()` return
> 8
> 3)
> `g.V(46).repeat(out().simplePath()).until(hasId(0)).repeat(out().simplePath()).until(hasId(276)).path().size()`,
> should return 9*8.
> - Current Behavior:
> The query 3 return 7 != 9*8.
> - Steps to Reproduce:
> Although the randomness of the graph data generation process, we still find
> the problem after many attempts. Reproduce: Generate a large enough graph ->
> Get all node ids -> Count the number of paths for any two ids -> Multiply and
> compare following our strategy.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
