[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17692229#comment-17692229
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-2824:
-------------------------------------------
spmallette commented on code in PR #1843:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1843#discussion_r1114446500
##########
gremlin-javascript/src/main/javascript/gremlin-javascript/test/cucumber/feature-steps.js:
##########
@@ -131,17 +131,30 @@ Given(/^using the parameter (.+) defined as "(.+)"$/,
function (paramName, strin
});
});
+var removeProperties = function(p) {
+ if (p === undefined) {
+ } else if (p instanceof graphModule.Vertex || p instanceof graphModule.Edge)
{
+ p.properties = undefined;
+ } else if (p instanceof Array) {
+ p.forEach(removeProperties)
+ } else if (p instanceof Map) {
+ removeProperties(Array.from(p.keys()))
+ removeProperties(Array.from(p.values()))
+ } else if (p instanceof graphModule.Path) {
+ removeProperties(p.objects)
+ }
+
+ return p
+}
+
When('iterated to list', function () {
- return this.traversal.toList().then(list => this.result = list).catch(err =>
this.result = err);
+ return this.traversal.toList().then(list => this.result =
removeProperties(list)).catch(err => this.result = err);
Review Comment:
as long as javascript matches the defined format for GraphSON i don't think
we need to change anything:
https://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/current/dev/io/#_vertex_3
> Properties on Elements
> ----------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-2824
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2824
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: dotnet, driver, go, javascript, process, python
> Affects Versions: 3.5.4
> Reporter: Valentyn Kahamlyk
> Assignee: Valentyn Kahamlyk
> Priority: Major
>
> Problem: When a user writes `g.V()` they get back a Vertex object. The
> problem is that depending on the execution context of the traversal, the
> result could be quite different, with or without properties.
> Solution: Implement new finalization strategy DetachStrategy(detachMode,
> properties) where mode is one of ALL, NONE or CUSTOM. `properties` is list of
> properties name, are taken into account only for CUSTOM mode.
> Discussion thread in dev list: [Proposal to handle properties on response
> Elements-Apache Mail
> Archives|https://lists.apache.org/thread/l8rw7ydj7kym8vhtwk50nhbp45ng9986]
> Stephen's thread in dev list: [The Issue of Detachment-Apache Mail
> Archives|https://lists.apache.org/thread/xltcon4zxnwq4fyw2r2126syyrqm8spy]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
