[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17695225#comment-17695225 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-2824: ------------------------------------------- spmallette commented on code in PR #1843: URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1843#discussion_r1122102698 ########## docs/src/upgrade/release-3.7.x.asciidoc: ########## @@ -29,6 +29,28 @@ Please see the link:https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/3.7.0/CHANGELOG.asc === Upgrading for Users +==== Properties on Elements Review Comment: i can't recall, but are there any compatibility issues to call attention to here? like can a 3.6.x driver work nicely with 3.7.x or the reverse? maybe there is something to call attention to here with that. > Properties on Elements > ---------------------- > > Key: TINKERPOP-2824 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2824 > Project: TinkerPop > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: dotnet, driver, go, javascript, process, python > Affects Versions: 3.5.4 > Reporter: Valentyn Kahamlyk > Assignee: Valentyn Kahamlyk > Priority: Major > > Problem: When a user writes `g.V()` they get back a Vertex object. The > problem is that depending on the execution context of the traversal, the > result could be quite different, with or without properties. > Solution: Implement new finalization strategy DetachStrategy(detachMode, > properties) where mode is one of ALL, NONE or CUSTOM. `properties` is list of > properties name, are taken into account only for CUSTOM mode. > Discussion thread in dev list: [Proposal to handle properties on response > Elements-Apache Mail > Archives|https://lists.apache.org/thread/l8rw7ydj7kym8vhtwk50nhbp45ng9986] > Stephen's thread in dev list: [The Issue of Detachment-Apache Mail > Archives|https://lists.apache.org/thread/xltcon4zxnwq4fyw2r2126syyrqm8spy] -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)