Hey Michael, I'll let Stephen confirm the path forward, but I bet you could use a Neo4jTrait implementation to do the TinkerPop2-style Neo4jBatchGraph. Checkout Neo4jTrait in TinkerPop3.
Marko. http://markorodriguez.com On Jun 11, 2015, at 4:07 PM, Michael Pollmeier <[email protected]> wrote: > Here you go - all pretty straightforward: > https://gist.github.com/mpollmeier/108ab8998e3b0321f020 > > Without a bulk api for neo4j it takes nearly 70s to create 30k vertices. > > There is currently no publicly available build artifact of tinkerpop3 that > contains neo4j-gremlin, so this all depends on custom local builds. > > The main thing is the obvious stuff I guess: disable indexes and integrity > constraints. Should be the same as the good old Neo4jBatchGraph, no? > https://github.com/tinkerpop/blueprints/tree/master/blueprints-neo4j-graph/src/main/java/com/tinkerpop/blueprints/impls/neo4j/batch > I guess for license reasons we can't just copy that but have to reimplement > it? > > Cheers > Michael > > On 12/06/15 01:19, Marko Rodriguez wrote: >> Michael, >> >> If there are any areas that can be sped up in the Neo4jGraph codebase, >> please identify. There hasn't been much manual testing of Neo4jGraph so any >> help/tickets/PRs you could provide would be greatly appreciated. >> >> Also, could you share your data loading code via a gist? >> >> Thanks, >> Marko. >> >> http://markorodriguez.com >> >> On Jun 11, 2015, at 6:37 AM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> General support for bulk loading is still under development and won't be >>> available for GA. Here's some related issues: >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-319 >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-320 >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-550 >>> >>> As for just straight loading, I'm not sure we've evaluated performance of >>> neo4j-gremlin at this point. Not sure what improvements are to be had, if >>> any. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Michael Pollmeier >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> What's the best way to insert many elements at the same time, is there some >>> sort of bulk mode that doesn't check for constraints? I didn't find >>> anything fitting in the code/documentation in TP3. >>> >>> Creating 25k vertices takes around 40s, and about 50s if I wrap it in a >>> transaction - that's a bit slow. >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Gremlin-users" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to [email protected]. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gremlin-users/5578CFDB.5070603%40michaelpollmeier.com. >>> >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Gremlin-users" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to [email protected]. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gremlin-users/CAA-H438DLd-K%2Baj%3DufCx5w3EtY6r32bTTVznTRgoNYwYOMXxCA%40mail.gmail.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Gremlin-users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gremlin-users/557A0695.9090807%40michaelpollmeier.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
