Yup that's what I meant.
On 12/06/15 10:54, Marko Rodriguez wrote:
Hey Michael,
I'll let Stephen confirm the path forward, but I bet you could use a Neo4jTrait
implementation to do the TinkerPop2-style Neo4jBatchGraph. Checkout Neo4jTrait
in TinkerPop3.
Marko.
http://markorodriguez.com
On Jun 11, 2015, at 4:07 PM, Michael Pollmeier <[email protected]>
wrote:
Here you go - all pretty straightforward:
https://gist.github.com/mpollmeier/108ab8998e3b0321f020
Without a bulk api for neo4j it takes nearly 70s to create 30k vertices.
There is currently no publicly available build artifact of tinkerpop3 that
contains neo4j-gremlin, so this all depends on custom local builds.
The main thing is the obvious stuff I guess: disable indexes and integrity
constraints. Should be the same as the good old Neo4jBatchGraph, no?
https://github.com/tinkerpop/blueprints/tree/master/blueprints-neo4j-graph/src/main/java/com/tinkerpop/blueprints/impls/neo4j/batch
I guess for license reasons we can't just copy that but have to reimplement it?
Cheers
Michael
On 12/06/15 01:19, Marko Rodriguez wrote:
Michael,
If there are any areas that can be sped up in the Neo4jGraph codebase, please
identify. There hasn't been much manual testing of Neo4jGraph so any
help/tickets/PRs you could provide would be greatly appreciated.
Also, could you share your data loading code via a gist?
Thanks,
Marko.
http://markorodriguez.com
On Jun 11, 2015, at 6:37 AM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> wrote:
General support for bulk loading is still under development and won't be
available for GA. Here's some related issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-319
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-320
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-550
As for just straight loading, I'm not sure we've evaluated performance of
neo4j-gremlin at this point. Not sure what improvements are to be had, if any.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Michael Pollmeier
<[email protected]> wrote:
What's the best way to insert many elements at the same time, is there some
sort of bulk mode that doesn't check for constraints? I didn't find anything
fitting in the code/documentation in TP3.
Creating 25k vertices takes around 40s, and about 50s if I wrap it in a
transaction - that's a bit slow.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Gremlin-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gremlin-users/5578CFDB.5070603%40michaelpollmeier.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Gremlin-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gremlin-users/CAA-H438DLd-K%2Baj%3DufCx5w3EtY6r32bTTVznTRgoNYwYOMXxCA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Gremlin-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gremlin-users/557A0695.9090807%40michaelpollmeier.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
