That's what was nice about gitter - no history limitation: > Gitter is entirely free for all public and open source conversations.
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Matt Frantz <[email protected]> wrote: > What are the constraints on price? Slack has limitations in its free tier, > e.g. limited chat history. > > https://slack.com/pricing > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 2:43 PM, David Robinson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > +1 for for the idea in general and Slack specifically. > > > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Nice to see you around, James. > > > > > > fwiw, Gitter supports GitHub markdown - that's pretty cool too as far > as > > > features go. > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Marko Rodriguez <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Whoa -- it has syntax highlighting. HipChat doesn't have that :(. > Just > > > > /code XXXXXX and it just makes it Courier font. > > > > > > > > Marko. > > > > > > > > http://markorodriguez.com > > > > > > > > On Oct 2, 2015, at 2:21 PM, James Thornton <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dropbox open-sourced Zulip last week... > > > > > > > > > > https://zulip.org > > > > > https://github.com/zulip > > > > > > > > > > HN Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10279961 > > > > > > > > > > - James > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Jason Plurad <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> +1 for Slack, currently using it. > > > > >> > > > > >> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:36 PM, pieter <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >>> +1 for slack. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On 02/10/2015 19:24, Stephen Mallette wrote: > > > > >>>> I think it was Matt Frantz who once recommended Slack. Neo4j > has > > a > > > > >>> pretty > > > > >>>> successful slack setup for community support. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Outside of slack, i've heard about this one from time to time: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> https://gitter.im/ > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> "Chat for GitHub" - it seems geared toward helping improve > > > > >>>> communication/support in open source communities. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Are there others out there to consider? > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Marko Rodriguez < > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> Awesome. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> Just to be clear. I'm not seeing this as a "vote medium" but > more > > > of > > > > a > > > > >>>>> "hang out with the development team and be able to communicate > > > > >> faster." > > > > >>> Of > > > > >>>>> course, JIRA/tickets/etc. are still the place where "formal > > > > >> directions" > > > > >>> are > > > > >>>>> placed. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> I use HipChat and iChat (jabber). HipChat is cool because its a > > > > "room" > > > > >>>>> where iChat is more "one-on-one." I'm really not hip to chat > > > > >> technology > > > > >>> so > > > > >>>>> if other people are cool with a "chat room" and have ideas on > how > > > to > > > > >>> form > > > > >>>>> it, please speak up. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> Thanks, > > > > >>>>> Marko. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> http://markorodriguez.com > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> On Oct 2, 2015, at 10:51 AM, Rich Bowen <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> Yes, absolutely legal. The "rule" is that decisions should be > > > > relayed > > > > >>>>> back > > > > >>>>>> to the list, for the community to comment on. But off list > > > > discussion > > > > >>>>>> itself isn't a problem. > > > > >>>>>> On Oct 2, 2015 6:33 PM, "Marko Rodriguez" < > [email protected] > > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> Hi everyone, > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> I'm sitting here going -- "man, wish I could just chat with > > Matt" > > > > to > > > > >>>>> talk > > > > >>>>>>> about the math-library and this bulking issue. > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> If Apache is cool with a public chat room to discuss > > development > > > > >>>>> issues, I > > > > >>>>>>> think that could really help me out (and perhaps others?). > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> It would be important that this chat room doesn't become a > > > > >>>>>>> "support@tinkerpop" room where people can post "I'm trying > to > > > > build > > > > >>> an > > > > >>>>>>> app, but I get this exception." Not sure how to ensure that > > > besides > > > > >>>>> through > > > > >>>>>>> social manipulation. > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> Anywho, does anyone have experience with "public chat rooms" > > and > > > is > > > > >>> this > > > > >>>>>>> legal for an Apache project to do? > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> Thoughts?, > > > > >>>>>>> Marko. > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> http://markorodriguez.com > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> -- > > > > >> Have a good one, > > > > >> Jason > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > James Thornton, *http://electricspeed.com < > http://electricspeed.com > > >* > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
