sorry - don't know why i didn't question that ticket further. that's pretty awesome - no asserts. i can add that, but how did you know your tests aren't passing if there was no assert?
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 2:35 PM, pieter <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Is it possible to have some discussion regarding > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-948 before 3.2.0 as I > now found myself in the scenario of not passing the test suite and not > sure of the resolution? > > Thanks > Pieter > > > > On 10/11/2015 20:02, Marko Rodriguez wrote: > > Hi Stephen, > > > > I concur. I have a list of notes that I've written that I will put into > JIRAs soon. Half will be possible for 3.1.1 and half will have to go into > 3.2.0. > > > > However, I don't think we should just rush to get 3.2.0 out. I would be > happy to see 3.2.0 around March-ish+. > > > > Thanks, > > Marko. > > > > http://markorodriguez.com > > > > On Nov 10, 2015, at 10:59 AM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> I added 3.1.1-incubating to JIRA as the next release to start > planning. I > >> think it would be good to do at least one (two?) release on the 3.1.x > line > >> before we think too seriously about 3.2.x and major change. Would be > nice > >> to see this 3.1.1-incubating development period see some more tutorials > and > >> other documentation, improve documentation organization, get apache > jenkins > >> flowing, etc. It seems to fit naturally into the slower holiday period > >> when folks aren't around as much. We could then plan up 3.2.x in the > new > >> year. > >> > >> we'd continue to develop on master through the end of the year as that > >> would continue to house the 3.1.x line of code. > >> > >> Thoughts? > > > >
