Ah sorry posted the wrong link, I mean this issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-949 I found the assert bug while investigating failing repeat tests.
Thanks Pieter On 10/11/2015 21:40, Stephen Mallette wrote: > sorry - don't know why i didn't question that ticket further. that's > pretty awesome - no asserts. i can add that, but how did you know your > tests aren't passing if there was no assert? > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 2:35 PM, pieter <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Is it possible to have some discussion regarding >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-948 before 3.2.0 as I >> now found myself in the scenario of not passing the test suite and not >> sure of the resolution? >> >> Thanks >> Pieter >> >> >> >> On 10/11/2015 20:02, Marko Rodriguez wrote: >>> Hi Stephen, >>> >>> I concur. I have a list of notes that I've written that I will put into >> JIRAs soon. Half will be possible for 3.1.1 and half will have to go into >> 3.2.0. >>> However, I don't think we should just rush to get 3.2.0 out. I would be >> happy to see 3.2.0 around March-ish+. >>> Thanks, >>> Marko. >>> >>> http://markorodriguez.com >>> >>> On Nov 10, 2015, at 10:59 AM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> I added 3.1.1-incubating to JIRA as the next release to start >> planning. I >>>> think it would be good to do at least one (two?) release on the 3.1.x >> line >>>> before we think too seriously about 3.2.x and major change. Would be >> nice >>>> to see this 3.1.1-incubating development period see some more tutorials >> and >>>> other documentation, improve documentation organization, get apache >> jenkins >>>> flowing, etc. It seems to fit naturally into the slower holiday period >>>> when folks aren't around as much. We could then plan up 3.2.x in the >> new >>>> year. >>>> >>>> we'd continue to develop on master through the end of the year as that >>>> would continue to house the 3.1.x line of code. >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>
