Yeah, i think that's a bit too heavy and coarse grained for our purposes. I was thinking more in terms of micro-benchmarks for our internal use.
Btw, Is your implementation such that any TP3 compliant database could work with the LDBC? On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Jonathan Ellithorpe <[email protected]> wrote: > This might be far more heavy-weight than what you are looking for, but I've > been working on implementing the LDBC Social Network Benchmark for TP3: > > http://ldbcouncil.org/developer/snb > > Jonathan > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 8:28 AM Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I had long ago built in a model for doing "performance tests" that used: > > > > https://github.com/carrotsearch/junit-benchmarks > > > > I thought we would at some point in the future build those out further > but > > that hasn't really happened. I'd probably just not worry about them at > this > > point, but while talking to Ted about it, I learned that carrotsearch has > > stopped development on their project and are instead directing folks to > use > > JMH: > > > > http://openjdk.java.net/projects/code-tools/jmh/ > > > > I think we should just consider dropping the carrotsearch tests in light > of > > this - perhaps do a review to see if there are any tests worth moving to > > unit or integration tests. Then we consider a better model for > performance > > testing with JMH (or something else) going forward. > > > > Thoughts? > > >
