Yup :) On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:40 AM Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yeah, i think that's a bit too heavy and coarse grained for our purposes. > I was thinking more in terms of micro-benchmarks for our internal use. > > Btw, Is your implementation such that any TP3 compliant database could work > with the LDBC? > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Jonathan Ellithorpe <[email protected] > > > wrote: > > > This might be far more heavy-weight than what you are looking for, but > I've > > been working on implementing the LDBC Social Network Benchmark for TP3: > > > > http://ldbcouncil.org/developer/snb > > > > Jonathan > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 8:28 AM Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > I had long ago built in a model for doing "performance tests" that > used: > > > > > > https://github.com/carrotsearch/junit-benchmarks > > > > > > I thought we would at some point in the future build those out further > > but > > > that hasn't really happened. I'd probably just not worry about them at > > this > > > point, but while talking to Ted about it, I learned that carrotsearch > has > > > stopped development on their project and are instead directing folks to > > use > > > JMH: > > > > > > http://openjdk.java.net/projects/code-tools/jmh/ > > > > > > I think we should just consider dropping the carrotsearch tests in > light > > of > > > this - perhaps do a review to see if there are any tests worth moving > to > > > unit or integration tests. Then we consider a better model for > > performance > > > testing with JMH (or something else) going forward. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > >
