i updated the image: http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.1.1-SNAPSHOT/tutorials/getting-started/
not sure where this should go in the reference docs - i guess in Introduction to Graph Computing maybe? reading over the section it doesn't fit in "easily" without some surrounding text. I kinda think we should refer people to Getting Started in that section rather than re-write a lot of what I wrote. Or does it go somewhere else more naturally than in that section? On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:24 AM, pieter-gmail <[email protected]> wrote: > I would say it should be in the reference doc also. > > Cheers > Pieter > > On 14/12/2015 13:04, Stephen Mallette wrote: > > oh - i see. i go into that in some detail in "Getting Started" in the > > "Next Fifteen MInutes" section. I could make that more clear there. > What > > if i added "out vertex" and "in vertex" to 1 and 3 in that first image in > > that section? would that be good? or do you think we should include > > something in the reference docs too? > > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:52 AM, pieter-gmail <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Sorry, should have been more explicit. > >> > >> Slide 24 shows a diagram illustrating on an edge the direction and which > >> side is the in and which side is the out vertex. > >> > >> person1 ----------knows----------->person2 > >> outV outE inV > >> > >> It will be nice if a similar illustration can be at the start of the > >> docs to clarify the convention regarding which side is in and out. > >> > >> Thanks > >> Pieter > >> > >> On 14/12/2015 12:42, Stephen Mallette wrote: > >>> I'm not sure what you mean (the link just goes to the start of marko's > >>> slides - can you maybe just issue a pull request to the reference docs > >> and > >>> we can review? i assume it's not a big change you're looking for? > >>> > >>> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 4:03 AM, pieter <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> Every now and again I need to confirm for myself, on an edge, which > side > >>>> is the in and out vertex. > >>>> > >>>> The current modern graph docs does not illustrate this. > >>>> > >>>> @marko slides > >>>> < > >>>> > >> > http://www.slideshare.net/slidarko/acm-dbpl-keynote-the-graph-traversal-machine-and-language > >>>> here does. > >>>> > >>>> It will be useful if the current docs can also illustrate this. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks > >>>> Pieter > >>>> > >> > >
